CIFR | References
References
CIFR
Kay & Saucier (2023):
Kay, C. S. & Saucier, G. (2023). The Comprehensive Infrequency/Frequency Item Repository (CIFR): An online database of items for detecting careless/insufficient-effort responders in survey data. Personality and Individual Differences.
Sources
Beach, 1988:
Beach, D. A. (1988). Identifying the random responder. Journal of Psychology, 123(1), 101–103.
Benning et al. (2018):
Benning, S. D., Barchard, K. A., Westfall, R. S., Brouwers, V., & Molina, S. M. (2018). Development of the Meanness in Psychopathy-Self Report. Manuscript in Preparation.
Curran & Hauser (2019):
Curran, P. G., & Hauser, K. A. (2019). I’m paid biweekly, just not by leprechauns: Evaluating valid-but-incorrect response rates to attention check items. Journal of Research in Personality, 82, 103849.
Dunn et al. (2018):
Dunn, A. M., Heggestad, E. D., Shanock, L. R., & Theilgard, N. (2018). Intra-individual response variability as an indicator of insufficient effort responding: Comparison to other indicators and relationships with individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33 (1), 105–121.
Fervaha & Remington (2013):
Fervaha, G., & Remington, G. (2013). Invalid responding in questionnaire-based research: Implications for the study of schizotypy. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1355–1360.
Forer (1974):
Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1), 118–123.
Hargittai (2009):
Hargittai, E. (2009). An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 130–137.
Huang et al. (2015):
Huang, J. L., Bowling, N. A., Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2015). Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: Evaluating validity and participant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 299–311.
Kay (2021):
Kay, C. S. (2021). The targets of all treachery: Delusional ideation, paranoia, and the need for uniqueness as mediators between two forms of narcissism and conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality, 93.
Kay (2023):
Kay, C. S. (2023). The anatomy of antagonism: Exploring the relations of 20 lexical factors of personality with Machiavellianism, grandiose narcissism, and psychopathy. Unpublished Manuscript.
Lilienfeld & Widows (2005):
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory - Revised (PPI-R): Professional Manual (pp. 1–160). Lutz, Florida: PAR.
Lynam et al. (2011):
Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Miller, D. J., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 108–124.
Maniaci & Rogge (2014):
Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48(1), 61–83.
Meade & Craig (2012):
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455.
Paulhus (1988):
Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Assessing self-deception and impression management in self-reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Unpublished Manual, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Snyder (1974):
Snyder, C. R. (1974). Why horoscopes are true: The effects of specificity on acceptance of astrological interpretations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(4), 577–580.